What is reflective learning?

I was just reading this article, and it finally crystalised why I find so much discussion about reflective learning so baffling. This is not what I do.

In case I’m not alone (and I’ve found I’m never alone on the internet), I’m sharing it.


Firstly, what is reflective learning as opposed to other kinds of learning?

For me, learning has 3 kinds:

1. Informational learning: facts, information, knowledge, skills.

This is when I don’t already know the answer, and I can find out by being told, or by reading about it, or copying someone else.

For example: Where is Timbuktoo? What does Dewey think reflection is? How do I embed a tooltip plug-in to my blog?

2. Critical learning: analysis, synthesis, critique, unpacking.

If I apply the stuff I learned through informational learning and put them together, I start to see how they work or don’t work. My description of that is my argument or my critical analysis. 

For example: Informational questions: what happens in Othello? what does this section of the text say? what does Dympna Callaghan say about the performance of Othello?

Critical analysis: Within the text of Othello, Callaghan’s analysis is not particularly helpful, but when we start to think about Othello not just as words but a performance text, the following issues become clear.

3. Reflective learning: ahah in the mirror!

This is when I already know the answer, but I might not yet have articulated it.

For example: Why do I feel uneasy about this dipiction of reflective learning in Boud, Keogh and Walker (1985)? The answer, I already know, is because this is not my experience. I am already an expert on my experience. But it might take me a whole blog post to articulate it.


Secondly, how does reflective learning work?

According to Schön:

The practitioner allows himself to experience surprise, puzzlement, or confusion in a situation which he finds uncertain or unique. He reflects on the phenomenon before him, and on the prior understandings which have been implicit in his behaviour. He carries out an experiment which serves to generate both a new understanding of the phenomenon and a change in the situation. (Schön 1983: 68)

Now this is not how it works for me, for three reasons.

Firstly, as a ‘practioner’ of reflection, I rarely have the feelings of ‘surprise, puzzlement, or confusion’. Usually I feel ‘something is wrong here’, ‘unease’, or just ‘blah’.  Nor is the situation that causes the problem usually ‘uncertain or unique’, but rather it’s usually habitual or predicatable. The problem isn’t that I don’t know what to do here, it’s that what we normally do here is wrong.

Secondly, I don’t consciously reflect on this wrongness at all. Usually, as you may have noticed, I feel ‘something is wrong’ and then BAM, it ‘hits me’. This crystalisation that I’m talking about here isn’t a slow acretion of ordered molecules; no, it’s a sudden flash of annuciation. One minute I’m barely aware there’s a problem, the next I am gripped by the blindingly obvious solution. Only then do I sit down and write it out, and then only to share it, not to help me understand it.

This whole blog post, tripartite conceptualisation and all, came to me in the time it takes to spread salmon pâté on a square cracker. So about 3 seconds. That’s typical.

If I do register that something is wrong, I don’t sit down, ‘reflect on the phenomenon before’ me, or ‘the prior understandings implicit in [my] behaviour.’ I go out and do something else, intentionally pushing the problem to the back of my mind, carefully not thinking about it. Gardening, cooking, housework, reading for fun, washing my hair (I have a lot of hair) are all good ways to do this for me. Having cleared my mind of niggling ‘blah-ness’, and other small things that are getting in the way of thought, I find that the BAM moment comes easily thereafter.

I don’t need to carry out ‘experiments’ because reflective learning is not learning where we discover more, it’s learning where we already know the answer. 


Sadly, there is little space for that in education theory or practice these days. No space for ‘let it happen’, no space for ‘I don’t understand it but it works better than your process’, no space for ‘trust your instincts’, no space for ‘and there was inspiration’.  There’s certainly no space for ‘it was instant, and right’.

We are supposed to take time to reflect, and to reflect intentionally. I don’t and it doesn’t help me. When I write a ‘reflective’ blog post, I mirror the stages set out by Dewey, or Schön, or Boud, Keogh and Walker. This is not because this is how I actually reflect, but because I can write in the genre and I want to get good marks.

I don’t remember starting at the baby steps of Dewey and progressing slowly through stages till I do it reflexively (and I do remember that for most of my habits of thought). I would certainly still use Dewey for other forms of learning–particularly critical analysis (or Kolb 1984, or any of the others). But it’s not reflective learning for me.

And yet, I’m a pretty reflective person, who often has insights that other people say they find helpful.


As always, this blog is about inclusiveness, about the many of ways of getting to any given point. (And then championing the ones that are most effective.)

If any of the models above describe you, if they help you–Yay! But if you’re like me, and it never worked… don’t worry, you are not alone.

And now that I’ve opened the doors, maybe neither my version nor any of the others work for you. Consider this an invitation to share your own ways of working. Take a second to reflect, you already know the answer. 


Succeeding in a Research Higher Degree

Doing a Research Higher Degree (like a PhD) is hard, but lots of people have succeeded and you can too. It’s easier if you understand how it works, this blog gives you the insider view.


Related Posts

Writing Well and Being Well for Your PhD and Beyond is published

It’s publication week for Writing Well and Being Well for Your PhD and Beyond: How to Cultivate a Strong and Sustainable Writing Practice for Life. It’s available as a paperback and ebook on all the big book websites, and via the publisher. As with all my books, I’m delighted if you buy a copy but also delighted if you recommend it to your university library so you get to read it and so does everyone else.

I had the best time writing this book, and the pre-readers have given such warm and delightful feedback. My series editor described the book as ‘your best friend’; ‘it’s personable, relatable, oozing with strategies.. It simply is a gift’. The peer reviewers said things like: it’s ‘calming and supportive’, ‘a useful review and re-thinking of the writing process’ that ‘gives permission’ for you to write, containing a ‘sprinkling of humour’ but also ‘addictively practical’.

Read More

What I learned from tracking my writing for a year

Back in 2021, I tracked my writing for a year. I kept a done diary for 6 months (as I’ve previously written about on the blog), but I also met up every month with an old co-author and we each wrote a little report on what we’d been doing: what was growing in the garden, what we were eating, what was going on in the world, what we were doing to move, what we were reading, but also what we were doing to progress our next writing project.

Read More

Towards a theory of University ‘excellence’

Universities like to say they are ‘excellent’. It’s a buzz word, and when you’ve been around campuses for a while, you realise it’s an adjective that’s applied to absolutely everything, so it kind of ends up meaning nothing. But when we look around universities, we see lots of ways they aren’t great. But recently I worked with another major partner in the global higher education industry (who is not a university) and it helped me see why ‘excellence’ discourse is good, actually.

Read More

Get the latest blog posts

%d bloggers like this: