Blog

Rethinking academic writing

One of the things that is challenging to me as I give other people feedback on academic writing is how often I have to say,

A thesis is an ugly, clunky, conservative genre, so write in an ugly, clunky and conservative way. You can’t be too obvious. Don’t worry about spelling things out, writing repetetively, or aiming for elegant prose. I don’t want surprises, and I certainly don’t want to have to read it twice.

This is true for the thesis, but it’s also true for the journal article, the conference paper, and the academic monograph.

Sometimes, as I’ve said before, I want to say, “Fuck this, I want to write like Edward Said“.

Other times I want to experiment. (Don’t forget that my academic training is in modernisms and its inheritors). I want to rethink what academic writing might look like. I want to write critically by critiquing what writing is in the academy.

So one of the things that I really enjoyed recently, in going back to study, is that I got a chance to explore that with a three part web essay on “Embodying Learners in New Media Literacies: Cyborgs, Androids and the Dance Apocalyptic“.

I think it was in many ways a failed experiement (I still like endings, the hyperlink citations were actually pretty hard work for both author and reader), but that’s the joy of being the student. It doesn’t have to be perfect, it just has to show your learning.

(And guess what my grade was? That’s right, I got 80%.)

SHARE

Succeeding in a Research Higher Degree

Doing a Research Higher Degree (like a PhD) is hard, but lots of people have succeeded and you can too. It’s easier if you understand how it works, this blog gives you the insider view.

Contact

Related Posts

Writing Well and Being Well for Your PhD and Beyond is published

It’s publication week for Writing Well and Being Well for Your PhD and Beyond: How to Cultivate a Strong and Sustainable Writing Practice for Life. It’s available as a paperback and ebook on all the big book websites, and via the publisher. As with all my books, I’m delighted if you buy a copy but also delighted if you recommend it to your university library so you get to read it and so does everyone else.

I had the best time writing this book, and the pre-readers have given such warm and delightful feedback. My series editor described the book as ‘your best friend’; ‘it’s personable, relatable, oozing with strategies.. It simply is a gift’. The peer reviewers said things like: it’s ‘calming and supportive’, ‘a useful review and re-thinking of the writing process’ that ‘gives permission’ for you to write, containing a ‘sprinkling of humour’ but also ‘addictively practical’.

Read More

What I learned from tracking my writing for a year

Back in 2021, I tracked my writing for a year. I kept a done diary for 6 months (as I’ve previously written about on the blog), but I also met up every month with an old co-author and we each wrote a little report on what we’d been doing: what was growing in the garden, what we were eating, what was going on in the world, what we were doing to move, what we were reading, but also what we were doing to progress our next writing project.

Read More

Towards a theory of University ‘excellence’

Universities like to say they are ‘excellent’. It’s a buzz word, and when you’ve been around campuses for a while, you realise it’s an adjective that’s applied to absolutely everything, so it kind of ends up meaning nothing. But when we look around universities, we see lots of ways they aren’t great. But recently I worked with another major partner in the global higher education industry (who is not a university) and it helped me see why ‘excellence’ discourse is good, actually.

Read More

Get the latest blog posts

%d bloggers like this: