Blog

‘Scout’s Pace’: Or what I learned in Girl Guides that we should use in the workplace

I was a Girl Guide once. Not for very long, but there were a few things I learned there that have stayed with me as useful for life. Last time, I talked about badges and volunteering. Here’s the second post in the mini-series where I talk about Scout’s Pace.

Scout’s Pace

Scout’s pace is a way of covering large distances on foot. You don’t run all the way, because it’s too far and you’d die. You don’t walk all the way, because that’s too slow and you wouldn’t get there on time.

Instead, you run for, say, 100 steps, then walk for 100 steps,then you run for 100 steps, and keep going. You don’t sprint, you just sort of jog along. This has a whole load of benefits.

Peter van der Sluijs 2012, From http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Black_and_white_woman_running.JPG

 

1.  You can keep this up for a long time. Because you have a strict number of steps you run, you stop before you feel tired. If you run until you are starting to get tired, you feel tired. You want to go slower (walk) or take a rest (stop). But Scout’s Pace works because you regularly feel ‘yes, I could run for a bit now’, and when you go back down to a walk you feel ‘yes, I could definitely start running again’.

2. It’s harder to start up into a run from standing still than it is from a walk. Walking between runs keeps up your forward momentum. The actions of your arms and legs and lungs are all very similar between running and walking. You are varying your intensity, but not your actions, your task, or your goal. Vary your work, but keep going.

3. It’s easy to imagine another 100 step walk. Big projects like PhDs are hard to conceptualise, and hard to maintain motivation for. But a series of simple mini-deadlines can help you to focus on the next task, and to get it done.

4. It keeps your work in balance. People either focus so much on writing (which is a high intensity task, like running) that we forget that there is a lot you can do to make your PhD move forward in the walking phases. Or they spend too much time walking, and never step it up to write.  You need both. 100 steps of going to the library and returning your overdue books; reading the style guide to resolve that nagging question about film titles; consulting your field notes. Then 100 steps of writing a draft of the introduction; or carrying out your experiment; or giving a conference paper.

5. It quantifies your progress. Sometimes it doesn’t feel like you got anywhere much. You feel like you were just plodding along. But when you count it up, you ran hundreds of steps today. This is validating. You know you are working hard. Of course you can’t see the finish line yet, that’s years away, but you can see what progress you made since this morning.

Finally, Scout’s Pace can take you a long way, but it won’t take you forever. In a three year project, you will get there if you run for 40-50 hours a week. You can’t, and you shouldn’t, attempt to work 24/7, or you’ll quickly find yourself, burned out, injured, exhausted or lost.

You can’t sprint a PhD, and you can’t walk it. Just put in a full week’s work of Scout’s Pace and after about three years, you should get where you need to be. 

(However, if you have a sports injury, are hit by a vehicle, someone stole your map, or any of the other misadventures that can happen to doctoral candidates, for goodness sake, stop running and go get help. That’s what we’re here for.)

SHARE

Succeeding in a Research Higher Degree

Doing a Research Higher Degree (like a PhD) is hard, but lots of people have succeeded and you can too. It’s easier if you understand how it works, this blog gives you the insider view.

Contact

Related Posts

Writing Well and Being Well for Your PhD and Beyond is published

It’s publication week for Writing Well and Being Well for Your PhD and Beyond: How to Cultivate a Strong and Sustainable Writing Practice for Life. It’s available as a paperback and ebook on all the big book websites, and via the publisher. As with all my books, I’m delighted if you buy a copy but also delighted if you recommend it to your university library so you get to read it and so does everyone else.

I had the best time writing this book, and the pre-readers have given such warm and delightful feedback. My series editor described the book as ‘your best friend’; ‘it’s personable, relatable, oozing with strategies.. It simply is a gift’. The peer reviewers said things like: it’s ‘calming and supportive’, ‘a useful review and re-thinking of the writing process’ that ‘gives permission’ for you to write, containing a ‘sprinkling of humour’ but also ‘addictively practical’.

Read More

What I learned from tracking my writing for a year

Back in 2021, I tracked my writing for a year. I kept a done diary for 6 months (as I’ve previously written about on the blog), but I also met up every month with an old co-author and we each wrote a little report on what we’d been doing: what was growing in the garden, what we were eating, what was going on in the world, what we were doing to move, what we were reading, but also what we were doing to progress our next writing project.

Read More

Towards a theory of University ‘excellence’

Universities like to say they are ‘excellent’. It’s a buzz word, and when you’ve been around campuses for a while, you realise it’s an adjective that’s applied to absolutely everything, so it kind of ends up meaning nothing. But when we look around universities, we see lots of ways they aren’t great. But recently I worked with another major partner in the global higher education industry (who is not a university) and it helped me see why ‘excellence’ discourse is good, actually.

Read More

Get the latest blog posts

%d bloggers like this: