Should a PhD be ‘hard’?

On the one hand, of course a PhD is ‘hard’–as in ‘has a high difficulty setting’ and also ‘is a lot of work’. It’s 3+ years of creating new knowledge!

But how ‘hard’ should it be, and what kind of ‘hard’? When students come to talk to me about worrying that they are finding their PhD ‘hard’, they tend to mean one of two very different things by it!


The first group find the PhD ‘hard’ and worry that this means they aren’t smart enough, that they won’t finish, that they don’t belong in the PhD program.
These students typically were excellent students in their school, undergraduate and coursework studies, and while they may have had to put in a good amount of work, they weren’t actually totally challenged. Part of the reason they are doing a PhD is because they are looking for a real challenge, but it’s also a bit of a worrying shock when they realise they maybe don’t know what they are doing and don’t really understand their material. They can’t get it right, and haven’t been getting the right answer for years.

This kind of student doesn’t necessarily have a lot of skills already in their tool box for when learning something is ‘hard’. Perhaps they ‘just get’ maths or poetry or writing, and are used to being considered ‘smart’ for work they find pretty quick or painless or fun to do. They are used to turning in work that is praised and given excellent grades.

Once they hit the messy, ugly, uncomfortable bits of the PhD, where multiple failures and lots of negative feedback is normal, they worry that they don’t have the tools to deal with it.

This student needs to hear:

  •  that it is normal to find the PhD hard,
  • that failing, getting negative feedback, being rejected from journals and grants, are all a regular part of the researcher experience,
    • and that you should also expect to use the failures to learn and do better the next time, and to have successes!
  • that you can get help from supervisors, academic skills advisors, peer researchers, mentors, books, blogs (like this one!), and the internet.
  • that if you keep persevering, and learning, you will probably succeed.

A typical example of this kind of student is the international student whose first language is not English. As I have argued before, this kind of student does face a challenge, but that challenge doesn’t have much impact on their passing rate or completion time. It’s a challenge that, with some work, can definitely be overcome. 


The second type of student is really struggling. They are finding the PhD tough for the wrong reasons.

Some research cultures are, frankly, toxic. Early mornings, late nights, few holidays, no weekends, not taking sick days, no time off for families or friends or sitting and thinking under a tree. The long hours are enforced by surveillance, micro-management and bullying. People who don’t ‘fit’ or who ‘aren’t fit enough’ are forced out. People with young children, a disability, or ill health are told (explicitly or implicitly) that they probably aren’t cut out for a PhD.

This kind of toxic culture can be created by an ambitious supervisor, or it can be created by a peer group of students who decide their way of researching is the best way, or it can be created by institutional structures. The university’s policies and processes around making accomodations, taking leave, scholarships, visas, etc.  can be unintentionally clunky, or intentionally punitive and strict. And, these three cultures often ‘intersect‘. For example: a pushy supervisor recruits and retains a group of students who match their idea of a ‘good’ student, around whom the university structures their progress policy.

And in this kind of situation, the student who feels excluded and tries to complain often finds themselves being treated as the problem (as Ahmed and Mewburn have both shown in different ways.)

A PhD is not examined on whether you are physically strong, or a quick thinker. There are no pop quizzes or exercise drills before you graduate.

A PhD is about sustained intellectual engagement, creating new knowledge, and contributing to the community of scholars in your field, through an extended work of academic writing, and (perhaps) presenting your work verbally to others. 

This student needs to hear:

  • if you feel like you are being bullied or exploited, then you probably are.
  • your institution, supervisor and peers are supposed to support you, and supposed to make reasonable adjustments to help you study.
  • if you feel you are not being supported, you may find it helpful to explore changing supervisors, institution, or degree.
    • or, if you decide to stay in a difficult situation (and there are often very good reasons for this!), you need to find a spaces and people where you are supported: you can get help from  academic skills advisors, peer researchers, mentors, books, blogs (like this one!), and the internet.
  • and, again, that if you keep persevering, and learning, you will probably succeed.


In the work I do, I often meet students who are worried they find the PhD hard, in both senses. I also know that both kinds of students can complete, gain their PhDs, and make a difference to the world.

If you are finding the PhD hard, that’s okay. If you are being bullied or are getting sick because of the PhD, that’s not okay. Find a way to make the PhD hard like climbing a mountain, not hard like being hit with a stick. 


What metaphors do you use for difficult or hard experiences? I spent a lot of my family holidays as a kid hiking up and down mountains, so that’s one I reach for over and over again, even though these days my knees can’t manage it! I’d love to hear about what works for you in your experiences so I can broaden the ways I think and talk about this!


Succeeding in a Research Higher Degree

Doing a Research Higher Degree (like a PhD) is hard, but lots of people have succeeded and you can too. It’s easier if you understand how it works, this blog gives you the insider view.


Related Posts

Writing Well and Being Well for Your PhD and Beyond is published

It’s publication week for Writing Well and Being Well for Your PhD and Beyond: How to Cultivate a Strong and Sustainable Writing Practice for Life. It’s available as a paperback and ebook on all the big book websites, and via the publisher. As with all my books, I’m delighted if you buy a copy but also delighted if you recommend it to your university library so you get to read it and so does everyone else.

I had the best time writing this book, and the pre-readers have given such warm and delightful feedback. My series editor described the book as ‘your best friend’; ‘it’s personable, relatable, oozing with strategies.. It simply is a gift’. The peer reviewers said things like: it’s ‘calming and supportive’, ‘a useful review and re-thinking of the writing process’ that ‘gives permission’ for you to write, containing a ‘sprinkling of humour’ but also ‘addictively practical’.

Read More

What I learned from tracking my writing for a year

Back in 2021, I tracked my writing for a year. I kept a done diary for 6 months (as I’ve previously written about on the blog), but I also met up every month with an old co-author and we each wrote a little report on what we’d been doing: what was growing in the garden, what we were eating, what was going on in the world, what we were doing to move, what we were reading, but also what we were doing to progress our next writing project.

Read More

Towards a theory of University ‘excellence’

Universities like to say they are ‘excellent’. It’s a buzz word, and when you’ve been around campuses for a while, you realise it’s an adjective that’s applied to absolutely everything, so it kind of ends up meaning nothing. But when we look around universities, we see lots of ways they aren’t great. But recently I worked with another major partner in the global higher education industry (who is not a university) and it helped me see why ‘excellence’ discourse is good, actually.

Read More

Get the latest blog posts

%d bloggers like this: