Hard work vs hard work

In ‘Should a PhD be hard?’, I differentiated between hard because of academic challenges, vs hard because of external challenges like people being mean to you.

In this post, I want to differentiate between ‘hard because it’s complex and challenging’, vs ‘hard because it requires a large volume of labour’.

Hard 1: It’s messy/complex/distressing/insoluble

The best reason to do a PhD is to solve a ‘hard’ question. PhD students often bring novel approaches to thorny problems. They have three plus years of pure research time to struggle with the really knotty problems. That is hard.

Some methodologies lean into the hardness. For example, grounded theory assumes that reality is messy and you have to create new theory from complex reality. That’s extra hard.

PhDs are often a time when you tackle material that is unfamiliar to you—new techniques, new theories, new bodies of knowledge. Learning all about a new field so you can write a single paragraph is hard.

I recently had to grapple with some deeply nasty research. I was dealing with racism and the debate in the field about whether what was happening was racist (it is, fyi). I was deeply distressed by the horrible primary texts I was dealing with, and by reading about all the ways that they were typical. This kind of research is hard. I am lead author for this chapter because my co-author is personally impacted by this specific form of hate, and didn’t feel able to take the time to deal with the material and everything it stirred up personally. So, it’s even harder if the material is directly impacting you.

Versus Hard 2: It’s a lot of work

There are lots of tasks that are time consuming or require careful checking… but can then be carried out as if you were a human research robot.

These are often tasks where technology offers solutions—spellcheck, citation management, finding books or articles in the library, mailing the article to a journal. (I am JUST old enough to have experienced life before all of these: I spent hours with dictionaries, style guides, card catalogues and annual indexes, and the postal service.) Still, keeping up a database of references doesn’t save you from the drudgery of having to format and upload citations; nor does uploading a document to the publisher’s portal exempt you from the struggle of technology.

There is still a lot of labour involved in research: whether that’s typing up transcripts, travelling to archives, trawling through databases, double checking code and calculations and much more.

Citations and formatting according to the style guide is a lot of work in terms of time and effort, but it’s very mechanical.


So, the first kind of hard needs me to be in the right mood—resilient enough to deal with the challenges, energetic, focussed.

This means that often I am not in the right mood. Sometimes that is a deal breaker (we nearly gave up on the nasty research as too hard, if only it wasn’t so urgent and necessary). But oftentimes, you can keep the project moving until you can get into the right mindset, because the bulk of a research writing project is typically made up of the more rote kind of hard work.

The other kind of hard doesn’t need me to be magically on, it’s more important is that I turn up to my desk and stick at it for long enough to get the thing done.

Hopefully this helps you identify what you find hard, and how to tackle the hard jobs! Seeing inside someone else’s process also helps you. People often tell me about how they believe they ‘should’ write, and how they believe they ‘should’ feel—and then feel guilty if their experience doesn’t match their beliefs. Showing what it’s really like on the inside, for many writers, can be reassuring, inspiring and useful!


Succeeding in a Research Higher Degree

Doing a Research Higher Degree (like a PhD) is hard, but lots of people have succeeded and you can too. It’s easier if you understand how it works, this blog gives you the insider view.


Related Posts

Writing Well and Being Well for Your PhD and Beyond is published

It’s publication week for Writing Well and Being Well for Your PhD and Beyond: How to Cultivate a Strong and Sustainable Writing Practice for Life. It’s available as a paperback and ebook on all the big book websites, and via the publisher. As with all my books, I’m delighted if you buy a copy but also delighted if you recommend it to your university library so you get to read it and so does everyone else.

I had the best time writing this book, and the pre-readers have given such warm and delightful feedback. My series editor described the book as ‘your best friend’; ‘it’s personable, relatable, oozing with strategies.. It simply is a gift’. The peer reviewers said things like: it’s ‘calming and supportive’, ‘a useful review and re-thinking of the writing process’ that ‘gives permission’ for you to write, containing a ‘sprinkling of humour’ but also ‘addictively practical’.

Read More

What I learned from tracking my writing for a year

Back in 2021, I tracked my writing for a year. I kept a done diary for 6 months (as I’ve previously written about on the blog), but I also met up every month with an old co-author and we each wrote a little report on what we’d been doing: what was growing in the garden, what we were eating, what was going on in the world, what we were doing to move, what we were reading, but also what we were doing to progress our next writing project.

Read More

Towards a theory of University ‘excellence’

Universities like to say they are ‘excellent’. It’s a buzz word, and when you’ve been around campuses for a while, you realise it’s an adjective that’s applied to absolutely everything, so it kind of ends up meaning nothing. But when we look around universities, we see lots of ways they aren’t great. But recently I worked with another major partner in the global higher education industry (who is not a university) and it helped me see why ‘excellence’ discourse is good, actually.

Read More

Get the latest blog posts

%d bloggers like this: