So what? Why does your thesis matter?

It’s a typical piece of advice to give authors of articles and theses, that you need to explain the ‘so what?’ of your contribution.

I’ve resisted using that language in my blog posts, usually preferring terms like ‘significance‘ or ‘explain how your work will be useful to others’.

‘So what?’ is a common shorthand term, like ‘unpack‘ or ‘horsey!’, that are meaningful to the people who are insiders and who know what it stands for… and really impenetrable for outsiders and new scholars. Inger, Shaun and I wrote a whole book explaining how to address this kind of confusing feedback shorthand (How to Fix your Academic Writing Trouble)! We didn’t cover ‘so what?’ in the book, but a conversation with a student today made me think that it would be really useful to discuss.

The main issue I have with ‘so what?’ is that written down it doesn’t have any tone-of-voice markers, and in English you can use this phrase in two very distinct ways depending on how you say it.

The first ‘so what?’ is the way the term is usually meant. It’s the sentence stem that begins questions like ‘So what comes next?’ ‘So what can I do with that information?’ ‘ So what does that mean for my research?’ ‘So what is your plan for your future research?’ These are all great questions, and it’s really important to answer them in your writing!

However, we can also ask ‘so what?’ in a sarcastic, or dismissive tone of voice to imply that ‘yeah, nobody cares’. This ‘so what?’ suggests that your research is not important, not useful, not interesting, it doesn’t lead anywhere. Your writing is pointless, ‘so what?’ said with a shrug implies, ‘nobody cares, I certainly don’t’.

And to some extent, that is actually true! We all have scholars in our field who don’t care about our research. It’s not relevant to them, it uses a research methodology or theory they don’t understand, it takes an approach they don’t like or disagrees with their findings.

So you’ll also need to decide, carefully, how you want to answer that dismissive ‘so what?’

You might decide to define your audience in such a way that you can exclude people who don’t take your approach: ‘This thesis addresses an audience of people who research A through B methods’. You might decide to demonstrate that your audience is missing out by not caring: ‘While A is not commonly studied in C field, in D field it is a growing and timely topic of research which has urgent implications for C scholars’.

Brainstorm similar framing sentences that are right for your project by talking with your supervisors and researchers in your field, or look through published articles and see what other people say. The challenge of justifying your research topic is far from unique to you and your project, so there is no need to reinvent the wheel!

And so when you are explaining the ‘so what?’, answer it twice, with both intonations in mind. First explain what your research means and how it contributes to knowledge, and then defend your research from people who might claim it is meaningless (because they are wrong, but they might not know it yet).

I hope this post helps you to frame this essential but difficult part of any piece of academic writing. Let me know your strategies, join the conversation on Twitter @ResearchInsiders.

Photo by Marek Piwnicki on Unsplash


Succeeding in a Research Higher Degree

Doing a Research Higher Degree (like a PhD) is hard, but lots of people have succeeded and you can too. It’s easier if you understand how it works, this blog gives you the insider view.


Related Posts

Writing Well and Being Well for Your PhD and Beyond is published

It’s publication week for Writing Well and Being Well for Your PhD and Beyond: How to Cultivate a Strong and Sustainable Writing Practice for Life. It’s available as a paperback and ebook on all the big book websites, and via the publisher. As with all my books, I’m delighted if you buy a copy but also delighted if you recommend it to your university library so you get to read it and so does everyone else.

I had the best time writing this book, and the pre-readers have given such warm and delightful feedback. My series editor described the book as ‘your best friend’; ‘it’s personable, relatable, oozing with strategies.. It simply is a gift’. The peer reviewers said things like: it’s ‘calming and supportive’, ‘a useful review and re-thinking of the writing process’ that ‘gives permission’ for you to write, containing a ‘sprinkling of humour’ but also ‘addictively practical’.

Read More

What I learned from tracking my writing for a year

Back in 2021, I tracked my writing for a year. I kept a done diary for 6 months (as I’ve previously written about on the blog), but I also met up every month with an old co-author and we each wrote a little report on what we’d been doing: what was growing in the garden, what we were eating, what was going on in the world, what we were doing to move, what we were reading, but also what we were doing to progress our next writing project.

Read More

Towards a theory of University ‘excellence’

Universities like to say they are ‘excellent’. It’s a buzz word, and when you’ve been around campuses for a while, you realise it’s an adjective that’s applied to absolutely everything, so it kind of ends up meaning nothing. But when we look around universities, we see lots of ways they aren’t great. But recently I worked with another major partner in the global higher education industry (who is not a university) and it helped me see why ‘excellence’ discourse is good, actually.

Read More

Get the latest blog posts

%d bloggers like this: