Blog

How to anonymise your research for peer review

The other day, I put out a call to my Twitter people:

Academic Twitter! How do you deal with self-citation in an article with anonymous peer review? We are major contributors in this tiny field, but we blanked so much in the framing that it basically disappeared. The article was rejected for not being clearly original/significant.

Thanks to Dr Molly Dollinger (@molliedollin) and Dr Joanna Tai (@DrJoannaT), two highly published academics, who both had the same advice: rather than removing or blanking any references to your own work, you submit a version where you write about yourselves as if you were someone else. (There was some differences of opinion about whether you should let the editor know what you had done, so consider what would work for your exact project.)

This was such a useful piece of advice for two reasons.

Firstly, it allowed us to actually make the point that work had been done in the field using this methodology but not yet addressing this significant gap with specific evidence rather than a line of blanks.

Secondly, it was much easier to talk about our contribution to the field and the limitations of our previous work when talking about ourselves in the third person. I often find that writing in the first person for early drafts helps make writing your position and voice much easier (Can I use ‘I’, section 6.2, How to Fix your Academic Writing Trouble). But when we were using first person plural language to talk about our other research, we got all tangled up in feeling awkward about being boastful or too self-referential. When we swapped to thinking about our contribution as if we were other people, we were suddenly able to write objectively and it was super easy to explain what had already been done, where the gap was, and where the new article was a contribution to knowledge.

So, I think even when I don’t need to anonymise my work, I will still use this strategy of writing about my research as if it was done by someone else. Anything that makes writing easier, clearer and less awkward is a win in my book!

Thank you so much to everyone who joined in on that conversation! Do you have strategies for approaching this challenge? Did you try this strategy and how did it work for you? Let me know over on @ResearchInsider.

Photo by Keisuke Higashio on Unsplash

SHARE

Succeeding in a Research Higher Degree

Doing a Research Higher Degree (like a PhD) is hard, but lots of people have succeeded and you can too. It’s easier if you understand how it works, this blog gives you the insider view.

Contact

Related Posts

Structural edits on paper

I just finished the first full draft of the Writing Well and Being Well book, and that means it’s time to go through the structural edits.
This blog post documents how I did it this time.

Read More

Does deadline juice give you wings?

“Deadline juice” is a term I just made up when talking to a student the other day, but it’s pretty apt. It describes the eustress response to an upcoming deadline—a healthy (yes short term appropriate stress responses are healthy!) jolt of adrenaline when your energy is up, your focus is up, your speed is up.

Read More

What is a ‘writing audit’ and when should you do one?

When I was part of the La Trobe RED team, and we were running our Accelerated Completion Programme for late-stage PhD candidates, we got people to do a thing we called a ‘writing audit’, where you counted up what was in all the sections of your PhD, and then worked out what was still missing. It could be scary, or a massive relief, but either way it gave you a sense of where you actually were.

Read More

Get the latest blog posts